How We Review Preconception Health Content

The source and safety policy for the preconception health article builder, including trusted sources, review dates, and medical boundaries.

  • Updated June 21, 2026
  • 2 checkable sources
  • Education only
A lab form, family history note, and checklist prepared for review.
Screening questions depend on history, risk, and clinician guidance.

How We Review Preconception Health Content

This starter is built around a strict article builder: the page design is reusable, but health content must meet source and safety rules before publishing.

Educational boundary: this article explains the portal's review rules. It does not diagnose, treat, or replace medical care.

Trusted source order

Prefer official public-health agencies, professional clinical organizations, and peer-reviewed medical literature. For this seed portal, examples include CDC, ACOG, FDA, and other official health agencies.

Required metadata

Each article should include:

  • a clear educational boundary;
  • at least two credible sources;
  • source titles, URLs, descriptions, and access dates;
  • a reviewed date;
  • internal links only to existing article slugs;
  • no diagnosis, treatment, or medication-change instruction.

What the builder rejects

The local quality scripts reject missing dates, duplicate slugs, missing source metadata, untrusted health sources, broken internal links, and copied domain text from the original 420 portal.

How to create the next article

Use the draft helper:

npm run article:new -- --slug your-slug --title "Your Title" --category "Visit Prep" 

Then edit data/articles.json, add official sources, and run:

npm run ci 

Safety line

The portal should help a reader prepare better questions. It should not tell a reader what condition they have, what medicine to stop, or what treatment to choose.

Related internal guides

Sources you can check

Each source opens in a new tab. Use them to verify the guide and bring questions back to a qualified clinician.